<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jeff watson &#187; non-profit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remotedevice.net/tag/non-profit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remotedevice.net</link>
	<description>remotedevice.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Future is Non-Profit</title>
		<link>http://remotedevice.net/blog/the-future-is-non-profit/</link>
		<comments>http://remotedevice.net/blog/the-future-is-non-profit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Watson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manifesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael jon jensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim o'reilly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remotedevice.net/blog/the-future-is-non-profit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the things I&#8217;ve written about recently is why non-profit/microprofit businesses are the ones</a>...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I&#8217;ve <a href="http://remotedevice.net/portfolio/writing/imap-manifesto/">written about recently</a> is why non-profit/microprofit businesses are the ones most likely to survive in an increasingly bleak future. As the economy, environment and global geopolitical situation continue to deteriorate, I&#8217;m pretty sure I won&#8217;t be alone in this idea for long &#8212; indeed, debates like <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/02/for-profit-non-profit-and-scar.html">this one</a> between Tim O&#8217;Reilly and Michael Jon Jensen illustrate that the zeitgeist might be slipping in that direction already:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve been a rational guy all my life. These days, because I&#8217;m paying attention, my ambient state often approaches rational panic. The world&#8217;s tipping points are being reached, in ecosystem after ecosystem; most indicators of heat, or weather extremes, or persistent toxin buildup, or acidification are busting the charts of &#8220;faster than expected.&#8221; Our Wile E. Coyote legs are spinning really fast.</p>
<p>What do these two themes &#8212; non- and for-profit, and the collapse of the natural world &#8212; have in common?</p>
<p>I dearly hope that we see, in the next few years, a robustly expanded nonprofit sector addressing these problems, and a vaster volunteerism sector. Because the for-profit sector has few truly long-term interests, on the timescale of the unfolding disaster. (&#8220;Human survival is a bonus, but that&#8217;s twenty years out. What about next quarter&#8217;s report?&#8221;)</p>
<p>Further, the scale and scope of the impending collapse will require a special spirit of voluntarism and shared labor and sacrifice, something that&#8217;s painfully hard to monetize. There are strong currents within the open-source world and the participatory-Web world, that could make a river of &#8220;stuff that matters&#8221; that might (to stretch the metaphor) turn the tide.</p>
<p>If the geeks, and the passionate, and the smart, and the ones who are paying attention, could collectively work on (yeah, here it is:) recovering our world, then we might have a chance at a pleasant future world, rather than one of grinding desperation.</p>
<p>The lion&#8217;s share of that work will not be about profit, or even business. It will be about people&#8217;s participation in what really matters, because they get satisfaction from being part of the solution. (<a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/02/for-profit-non-profit-and-scar.html">O&#8217;reilly Radar</a>)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://remotedevice.net/blog/the-future-is-non-profit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

