<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jeff watson &#187; theo jansen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remotedevice.net/tag/theo-jansen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remotedevice.net</link>
	<description>remotedevice.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Code and Materiality: Strandbeest and mechanical computing</title>
		<link>http://remotedevice.net/blog/code-and-materiality-strandbeest-and-mechanical-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://remotedevice.net/blog/code-and-materiality-strandbeest-and-mechanical-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Watson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analog computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antikythera mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles babbage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ctcs-677]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johanna drucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strandbeest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tara mcpherson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theo jansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remotedevice.net/?p=1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Johanna Drucker’s discussion of code and materiality (”Code is not an immaterial ideal“) got me thinking about Theo Jansen’s Strandbeest project...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johanna Drucker&#8217;s discussion of code and materiality (&#8220;<a href="http://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&#038;bookkey=353566">Code is not an immaterial ideal</a>&#8220;) got me thinking about Theo Jansen&#8217;s <a href="http://www.strandbeest.com/index.html">Strandbeest</a> project:</p>
<p><object width="400" height="320"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=952254&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=952254&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="320"></embed></object></p>
<p>Jansen&#8217;s Strandbeests are the product of an iterative programming process that completely collapses the supposed boundary between materiality and code. The intricate interlocking wooden components of these lumbering giants constitute simple circuits, storage devices and if/then statements that govern the way the &#8220;animals&#8221; move and respond to their environment; like a traditional software designer, the Strandbeests&#8217; &#8220;programmer&#8221; deploys certain arrangments of form, sees what works and what doesn&#8217;t (beta testing), then &#8220;re-codes&#8221; to make the animals more likely to survive and prosper. Jansen himself considers his Strandbeests a kind of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_life">ALife</a> project wherein new forms are &#8220;evolved&#8221; and the &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b694exl_oZo">winning codes multiply</a>.&#8221; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_computing">Physical computing</a> projects like this (and this is clearly one of the most radical of its kind, given that the Strandbeests use no electronics whatsoever) are provocative examples of Drucker&#8217;s contention that &#8220;form is constitutive of information, not its transparent presentation.&#8221; (139)</p>
<p>Leaving magical Strandbeest beach aside for the moment, I wonder how other non-electronic digital systems complicate or compliment some of the thinking we&#8217;ve been doing this week about code and protocol. In particular, I&#8217;m curious to see if moving around or beyond our contemporary notion of what constitutes computation might address some of the ambiguities <a href="http://technocultures.blogspot.com/2009/09/digital-or-virtual.html">Mei identified</a> regarding commonly-held definitions of the <span style="font-style:italic;">digital </span>and the <span style="font-style:italic;">virtual</span>. Charles Babbage&#8217;s famous <a href="http://www.computerhistory.org/babbage/">Difference Engine</a> (a programmable mechanical computer from 1847), Leibniz&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepped_Reckoner">Stepped Reckoner</a>, clockwork astrolabes like the incredible <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism">Antikythera Mechanism</a> or the lesser-known but perhaps coolest-of-all pocket-sized <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curta">Curta Calculator</a> each exhibit very different kinds of graphesis (or maybe we should coin a new word here: <span style="font-style:italic;">antikemenesis</span>?) &#8212; where is the &#8220;code&#8221; when it cannot be separated from the mechanical processes that articulate it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://remotedevice.net/blog/code-and-materiality-strandbeest-and-mechanical-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theo Jansen&#8217;s Strandbeest</title>
		<link>http://remotedevice.net/blog/theo-jansens-strandbeest/</link>
		<comments>http://remotedevice.net/blog/theo-jansens-strandbeest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Watson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theo jansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.157/~remotede/uncategorized/theo-jansens-strandbeest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A scientist-turned-artist, Jansen&#8217;s bizarre beach animals have their roots in a computer program</a>...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="400" height="320"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=952254&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=952254&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="320"></embed></object><br />
<blockquote>A scientist-turned-artist, Jansen&#8217;s bizarre beach animals have their roots in a computer program that he designed 17 years ago in which virtual four-legged creatures raced against each other to identify survivors fit enough to reproduce. Determined to translate the evolutionary process off-screen, Jansen went to a local shop and found his own alternative to the biological cell &#8212; the humble plastic tube. (<a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2005/01/66356">Wired: Wild Things Are On The Beach</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>See also: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b694exl_oZo">Theo Jansen at TED</a> and <a href="http://www.strandbeest.com/#">strandbeest.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://remotedevice.net/blog/theo-jansens-strandbeest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

